From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 18:00:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07548D03574; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A26918F6; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [194.32.164.15] ([194.32.164.15]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id v28Hxkn9077977; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:59:46 GMT (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system From: rb@gid.co.uk In-Reply-To: <20170308164050.GA16744@lonesome.com> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:59:46 +0000 Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD ports , Chris H Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1EB4A1FD-F42E-4E15-A16D-932C0AC4A10D@gid.co.uk> References: <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> <20170306141633.GP13006@home.opsec.eu> <9442B4D5-FEAF-4BF1-9470-60897F97C13C@gid.co.uk> <20170308164050.GA16744@lonesome.com> To: Mark Linimon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 18:00:10 -0000 Hi, > On 8 Mar 2017, at 16:40, Mark Linimon wrote: >=20 > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:00:23PM +0000, rb@gid.co.uk wrote: >> Let me rephrase that: the link http://purelang.bitbucket.org/ >> quoted on https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions doesn=E2=80=99t= work, >=20 > That's the URL in lang/pure/Makefile. >=20 >> should be https://bitbucket.org/purelang/ >=20 > Hmm. I looked and it seems like https://purelang.bitbucket.io/ is > a better choice? What do you think? Sure. > mcl >=20 -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk