From nobody Mon Jul 8 09:45:14 2024 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WHfP746VZz5PlSV for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 09:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WHfP722b2z4LZW for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1720431915; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oVu7vjsuT6S0sVkwBaFBaLEZ40zynGI4hNZE+zRSxrSSDfvYJh3mL8U65l8R+Iui3j7p9j jvcVaYHS63uD5UmqXPQeAI3dl4R6zftfhNFhQvS328XrhwFhgr0XRJI9Es1dA84Txtnx23 BEEXthlokhFUvayOs7Qo8JOowRzJN5vctgfkik/zHubms4WNb1ABRpkrEqp1eEw5TrnK+E x6YgfrKc9aP5mFhGo662mEoGDiXhU3jSF4d+V6GWg7gv4qUM/7Ao60lgnfbPM7CX1dPa1T 4gsF3wcirLBwRg2ArwPJZxEmT14Nub8Nb+U/1oCGwOcFEb6Mn3JStdblBC2SaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1720431915; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1br4CKszFi88Bam0lno/SPNgYSsZz40y7fyacBr059c=; b=mw0Ff3NxyZ1o/h+CbmN9foNP5twA+szeSAe5nGgw6eIQuuAkovgYgAZygu9+CfsF9/p3eQ SnB7FOmf6QikyPQIqytvWDrQkeL7C3z2lbzYRIBtO8rfX8iRPK9S9fqhEYk4cBzHwlKnus TqtmOraUXHGafFbSCbDEWq5X3cpAMWbgWEXl9o05qnifEYDFPjl2a/YRm2lO3HheXGD1Qe DzBdcx7j8GoKMOMbc7k/u9rJELWW4TpZvxG08wSN3KAKaUjiY9cyvB0Txpm/TU5+/8tQyq duvT6ts0mTesG8v/9+V8WAYOlN+Ca/Wao0J7yF7hXutxCNZmTN6F1Z6fKBx9yQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WHfP71XYbzmSb for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4689jFlg024872 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:45:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4689jFLo024871 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:45:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280189] sysutils/beadm-devel - beadm(1) possible deprecation? Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 09:45:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: erichanskrs@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280189 Bug ID: 280189 Summary: sysutils/beadm-devel - beadm(1) possible deprecation? Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: erichanskrs@gmail.com CC: vermaden@interia.pl CC: vermaden@interia.pl Flags: maintainer-feedback?(vermaden@interia.pl) As per bug #254466, comment #20, I'm opening this PR here regarding https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/beadm https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/beadm-devel Also, trying to understand ports management:=20 Who decides when and if a port gets deprecated and removed? What's the use case for not deprecating* https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/sysutils/beadm-devel and, after an appropriate elapsed time removing it from the ports tree? No more confusion, less maintenance; perhaps I'm missing something here? ---- * The creator and maintainer (Slawomir Wojciech Wojtczak - vermaden) has responded in bug #254466, comment #6; and in bug #254466, comment #14: =E2=80=9CI think that *sysutils/beadm-devel* can be deleted as it was not u= pdated since 3 years ... =E2=80=9D last log entries https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/log/sysutils/beadm-devel indicate merely managerial changes. There is a current active and maintained version beadm(8) - by the same creator/maintainer: https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/beadm --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=