Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Mar 2002 19:27:18 -0500 (EST)
From:      Kenneth Culver <culverk@alpha.yumyumyum.org>
To:        Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, "Steve B." <steveb99@earthlink.net>, "Eugene L. Vorokov" <vel@bugz.infotecs.ru>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: C vs C++
Message-ID:  <20020305192548.Y6706-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020305215702.GA76733@student.uu.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I do agree that when the extra features of C++ are used this often
> results in bloated programs but this can at least in part be blamed on
> insufficiently skilled programmers.
>
>
> Note that C++ is not really an OO language. It is probably better to
> call it a language with support for object-oriented programming (as
> well as support for other programming styles.)
>
I'll agree to that... :-D It's basically what I've been trying to say.
That and if he's using gcc to compile, he might not get completely
un-buggy code when he compiles c++ apps.

Ken


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020305192548.Y6706-100000>