From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 3 17:00:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877901065676 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:00:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A388FC14 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p43H0O1E006078 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:00:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p43H0OkI006077; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:00:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 17:00:24 GMT Message-Id: <201105031700.p43H0OkI006077@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Rusty Nejdl Cc: Subject: Re: ports/150883: Ports games/openastromenace won't compile on 64 bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Rusty Nejdl List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 17:00:25 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/150883; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Rusty Nejdl To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9E=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=B3_=D0=90=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BA=D1=81?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=B5=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2?= Cc: Mark Linimon , Subject: Re: ports/150883: Ports games/openastromenace won't compile on 64 bit Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 11:57:54 -0500 On Tue, 03 May 2011 13:48:47 +0400, =D0=9E=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=B3 =D0=90=D0=BB= =D0=B5=D0=BA=D1=81=D0=B5=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2 wrote: > Mark Linimon =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(=D0=B0= ) =D0=B2 =D1=81=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D0=BC=D0= =B5 Tue, 03 > May 2011 10:40:12 +0400: > >> I've Cc:ed the maintainer, who has been active in the past month,=20 >> but at >> this point IMHO maintainer-timeout should apply and any committer=20 >> would >> thus be able to commit after testing. > > sorry for timeout. > commit it please, if patch does work This patch solves the issue I reported and there have been no changes=20 to the port since this so the patch should apply cleanly. If possible,=20 please commit. I can submit another PR if I find anything else amiss. Rusty Nejdl