Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:52:06 +0100 From: Sylvestre Gallon <ccna.syl@gmail.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: antab@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, cognet@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Atmel at91sam9261-ek support. Message-ID: <164b4c9c0903241252y3f0f8958y88be873ae6c9664a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090324.084233.1626286031.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <8BC7AFF2-E0E1-4498-82E8-29C3F64C5E2E@FreeBSD.org> <164b4c9c0903240210v4d05770du1f02de26f42f6454@mail.gmail.com> <00675D70-A3F9-412F-BDB9-F9CF8C91D75A@freebsd.org> <20090324.084233.1626286031.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:42 PM, M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > In message: <00675D70-A3F9-412F-BDB9-F9CF8C91D75A@freebsd.org> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Arnar Mar Sig <antab@freebsd.org> writes: > > All of this hand wringing is because we've boguslly collapsed the core > support, the SoC support and the board support into one file. =A0We have > to move away from that model and properly layer things to move > forward. =A0The means by which we load this or that thing isn't going to > matter so much until we adopt this better structure. > > Warner > Do you think that I can try to update the diff to separate the SoC code, the board code and the at91 generic code and re-submit it before the end of the week? Also I'm currently looking for google summer of code possible proposals and have access to a big range of different Atmel boards. Do you think that the improvement of the at91 architecture, and the adding of support for another SoC could be a potential subject ? And if so, is someone ready to be my mentor for this project ? Cheers --=20 Sylvestre Gallon (http://devsyl.blogspot.com) Fifth Grade Student @ Epitech & Researcher @ LSE R&D @ Rathaxes (http://www.rathaxes.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?164b4c9c0903241252y3f0f8958y88be873ae6c9664a>