From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 5 11:21:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3201065674 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianf@clue.co.za) Received: from inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net (inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net [41.161.16.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED818FC0C for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [41.154.88.19] (helo=clue.co.za) by inbound01.jnb1.gp-online.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NnVae-0008Nw-0E for current@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:21:08 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=clue.co.za) by clue.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1NnVaT-0003Ft-3p for current@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:20:57 +0200 To: current@freebsd.org From: "Ian FREISLICH" X-Attribution: BOFH Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:20:57 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: Subject: dev.bce.X.com_no_buffers increasing and packet loss X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:21:14 -0000 Hi I have a system that is experiencing mild to severe packet loss. The interfaces are configured as follows: lagg0: bce0, bce1, bce2, bce3 lagproto lacp lagg0 then is used as the hwdev for the vlan interfaces. I have pf with a few queues for bandwidth management. There isn't that much traffic on it (200-500Mbit/s). I see only the following suspect for packet loss: dev.bce.0.com_no_buffers: 140151466 dev.bce.1.com_no_buffers: 514723247 dev.bce.2.com_no_buffers: 10454050 dev.bce.3.com_no_buffers: 369371 Most of the time, these numbers are static, but every once in a while they increase massively by several thousand, but only on 2 interfaces. The 1 minute average rate on those interfaces is 266/s and 123/s. Does anyone think this is related to the packet loss or are these counters just a red herring? Is there anything that can be done to reduce this count? Ian -- Ian Freislich