From owner-cvs-all Mon Nov 18 6:19:46 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7785D37B401; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 06:19:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [193.111.112.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4783643E3B; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 06:19:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.6/8.12.6/ZEIST.DE) with ESMTP id gAIEJhGF037890; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:19:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAIEJcC7037889; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:19:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:19:38 +0100 From: marius@alchemy.franken.de To: Nakata Maho Cc: maho@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, alexander@leidinger.net Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/ifc Makefile pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/lang/ifc/files assert_fail.c cpio-exclude cxa_atexit.c cxa_finalize.c errno_location.c ld.c linux_file.c mcount.S patch-aa patch-ifc stderr.c sysconf.c Message-ID: <20021118141938.GS89667@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <200211180927.gAI9RWOa074354@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021118115407.GQ89667@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20021118.224523.640912260.maho@scarlatti.synchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021118.224523.640912260.maho@scarlatti.synchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:45:23PM +0900, Nakata Maho wrote: > > > the freebsd-ports of icc and ifc still cannot coexist as both ports patch > > the libraries in different ways but install them to the same location, > > i.e. overwrite each others' libraries. therefore please revert the backout > > of the check for icc in the ifc-port. > > I read through codes(but not deeply concerned), > and I think simply install icc over ifc is ok, but ifc over icc won't be good. > Well, extensive test should be done for both compiler... > forgot, as long it's not sure that both ports really can coexist happily please put the check for icc back into the ifc-port. thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message