From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Apr 19 20:26:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B85B14A01 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485991C0D; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ascDj-000HvO-Mh; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:26:03 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:26:03 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Lev Serebryakov Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) Message-ID: <20160419202603.GL2282@home.opsec.eu> References: <76093.1461096570@critter.freebsd.dk> <5716924C.4060104@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5716924C.4060104@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:26:00 -0000 Hi! > I don't see anybody, who say "remove this packaging code, it is all > completely wrong, BS, whatever". All objections are against mechanical > splitting base to 700+ packages, not against packaged base per se. I also run a bunch of boxes, and I do not have a problem with 700+ base packages on top of the other ones I use. But: I have not tested pkg base yet. I'm just a happy pkg user 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !