Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:26:03 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) Message-ID: <20160419202603.GL2282@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <5716924C.4060104@FreeBSD.org> References: <E1asbZj-0003Ra-Qs@rmm6prod02.runbox.com> <76093.1461096570@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAHM0Q_P_keB%2BehoTBKZvFtU-toXbrBO4X0HSn=BukoYZJPR2nA@mail.gmail.com> <5716924C.4060104@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > I don't see anybody, who say "remove this packaging code, it is all > completely wrong, BS, whatever". All objections are against mechanical > splitting base to 700+ packages, not against packaged base per se. I also run a bunch of boxes, and I do not have a problem with 700+ base packages on top of the other ones I use. But: I have not tested pkg base yet. I'm just a happy pkg user 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160419202603.GL2282>