From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 24 21:51:40 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5AB106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:51:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl)
Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E2C8FC12
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:51:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com)
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>) id 1SiuiZ-0000HF-NA
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:51:39 -0700
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <1340574699711-5721495.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20120624T221657-6@post.gmane.org>
References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org>
	<402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191952250.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<26.30.12873.06EE2EF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com>
	<20120621230302.GB575@hemlock.hydra>
	<loom.20120624T221657-6@post.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:51:40 -0000

> I am more concerned about an aspect of the language the clang tools are
> written in, namely the use of object-oriented paradigm of c++ (it is a
> phony
> paradigm, one that does not exist in nature or reality, which explains
> the failure rate of C++ OO projects historically and current usage
> decline).
> I sense that the relative slowness of generated code has to do with it.
> Perhaps
> some other attributes of that code's quality too, even if not now, then in
> the
> future.

Yes, this is one thing really puzzled me. Maybe it's related to Apple's
affinity 
to Objective-C? 

--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-Clang-tp5715861p5721495.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.