Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:15:40 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD Message-ID: <4C05BECC.9030202@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <4C0559C2.60300@stillbilde.net> References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org> <20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org> <20100531095617.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <AANLkTin-gJ5ehBsIB3c7VCqdivsiKf3kZdwXkod6Lgsf@mail.gmail.com> <86eigqol8l.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4C054335.4040802@stillbilde.net> <1275418622.1516.1.camel@pixi.PuffyBSD.Com> <4C0559C2.60300@stillbilde.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FWIW, I support the import. I don't think GCC is as bad as other people think it is, but I also have been gravely concerned of the the reduction of toolchains down close to one in our business. That in and of itself warrants supporting any viable alternative.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C05BECC.9030202>