From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jul 19  7:21:14 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from fep8.mail.ozemail.net (fep8.mail.ozemail.net [203.2.192.102])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1B7E914F39; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 07:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from c9710216@atlas.newcastle.edu.au)
Received: from atlas.newcastle.edu.au (slnew55p58.ozemail.com.au [203.108.151.136]) by fep8.mail.ozemail.net (8.9.0/8.6.12) with ESMTP id AAA12805; Tue, 20 Jul 1999 00:20:53 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <3793339D.297B21F3@atlas.newcastle.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 00:18:05 +1000
From: obituary <c9710216@atlas.newcastle.edu.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Problem with cvsup
References: <3791BFE4.D18901D3@atlas.newcastle.edu.au>
	 <xzp3dymnm2b.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <37931C99.7038563D@atlas.newcastle.edu.au> <xzpiu7gn6yd.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> 
> obituary <c9710216@atlas.newcastle.edu.au> writes:
> > pseudo-device   ppp     2               #Point-to-point protocol
> > options PPP_BSDCOMP                     #PPP BSD-compress support
> > options PPP_DEFLATE                     #PPP zlib/deflate/gzip support
> 
> Why are you using kernel pppd instead of userland ppp?

Why not?  Is there some issue regarding kernel pppd that I'm not aware
of?  I used kernel pppd simply because I assumed the kernel
implementation would be more efficient, and I'd had prior experience
using pppd (under Linux).


-jake (obituary)
c9710216@atlas.newcastle.edu.au


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message