From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 6 13:47:53 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA14005 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 13:47:53 -0700 Received: from virgo.ai.net (root@virgo.ai.net [198.69.44.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA13986 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 13:47:48 -0700 Received: from aries.ai.net (aries.ai.net [198.69.44.1]) by virgo.ai.net (8.6.11/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA06129; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 16:47:44 -0400 Received: (from nc@localhost) by aries.ai.net (8.6.11/8.6.12) id QAA26785; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 16:47:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 16:47:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Network Coordinator To: Charles Henrich cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whatsup with cdrom.com ? In-Reply-To: <199510061800.OAA04666@crh.cl.msu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 6 Oct 1995, Charles Henrich wrote: > For the past few days now I've noticed that cdrom.com appears to be much slower > all of a sudden, has dropped its connection limit considerably, and has periods > where all connections are refused (i.e. no ftpd). Is this a new FreeBSD > problem or hardware again? Not that I am one to complain or anything, but since ftp.cdrom.com upgraded to an FT-3 I would have expected all the limits to be broken, but instead it looks like there are more in place. Its none of my business, so I don't want to offend anyone. But I remember the older ftp.cdrom.com that ran off a T-1 had 192MB of ram and supported 500 users. Now it seems slower, is running on 128MB ram [hardware, I know] and has a T3 which strikes me at the very least, as somewhat ironic. -Jerry.