From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 31 15:53:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD75F460; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3CA238A; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n3so1623798wiv.2 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:53:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=erdWnNErJr//unLU9dzok8cRIdqeAlUFOjOe5FnJkUo=; b=gAYqJzVpcPZna6FGJh30cVA0QaoBCPQUPdg3bfceopmpGPBR0+Kf8H5PV66IGQCT4H SCmqaGFOgKI+GU88JK6HMrPa+PeaI8FWR3RmOMXVAbhsOczzFvLJc6gQ4LtJqCzHoqG2 BSQJrLZyi7vasNNtt0Nb6qsrqJMP6/ZPFvzHm6By8EcQxCFBuugTcjDv0ySLr0u3kpkX Uha2N2Mo4VqjcN0YgCFnLVXgFlUT7If/U1dMLmtEPbABc7JG6l/492Esk12/IdMcgBH5 N0Pep5UZc4SBS/RY3bwBS2pRSG/jZzFUgw7710ocOhfLXb5rtpDNstxBEiz+WxB98IUx YDEQ== X-Received: by 10.194.209.230 with SMTP id mp6mr28978177wjc.2.1414770826128; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:53:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.157.202 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:53:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5453A9E4.6040702@FreeBSD.org> References: <544E0FC8.8090605@FreeBSD.org> <544F61F9.6040408@FreeBSD.org> <544FE187.3030404@FreeBSD.org> <5450D27D.4080508@FreeBSD.org> <5451F42B.5020805@FreeBSD.org> <545270A7.6030807@FreeBSD.org> <54535178.8040706@FreeBSD.org> <54536BB1.6060001@FreeBSD.org> <54539F7F.3070901@FreeBSD.org> <5453A9E4.6040702@FreeBSD.org> From: Miguel Clara Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:53:25 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CFT: Update to xf86-video-ati 7.5.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:53:48 -0000 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron wrote: > On 31.10.2014 15:56, Miguel Clara wrote: > > About the "but none have a usable configuration" does this mean I can > > have a xorg.conf that would work with the ati card, or does it simple > mean > > we are one step closer? > > Currently, no update to xorg-server or xf86-video-ati will make your > card work, because we lack the support in the kernel. > > However, now you can keep both xf86-video-ati and xf86-video-intel > installed and the server won't crash :) And one day in the future, the > Radeon card will come to life, though definitely not for today's > Halloween :) > > With power consumption in mind, I would probably don't install > xf86-video-ati at all for now, so radeonkms isn't loaded. > > Agreed, but ideally one could change as needed... ofc it will always mean restart Xorg... IFAIK you can do it in Linux. In any case this laptop has the battery dead already so its AC always. On another note, as I've refereed in the other report, my perfect scenario for this laptop would be using the intel on host and pass-trough the ati to virtualized guest... vbox is not and option and AFAIK bhyve is far from that too, but maybe Xen will be a solution soon :) But for now I'll just keep testing with this one ;) thanks for you're time on this btw, please continue the good work -- > Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron > >