From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Mar  6 19:58:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA20623
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 19:58:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cabal.io.org (cabal.io.org [198.133.36.103])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA20541
          Wed, 6 Mar 1996 19:58:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from taob@localhost) by cabal.io.org (8.7.4/8.7.4) id WAA12684; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 22:57:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 22:57:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>
To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: FREEBSD-HACKERS-L <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: rlogind/telnetd not using all tty's? 
In-Reply-To: <545.826158432@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960307225157.12547F-100000@cabal.io.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 7 Mar 1996, Gary Palmer wrote:
> 
> Is libutil.so.whatever identical on the two machines?

    Nope...

-r--r--r--  1 root  bin  9357 Jan 25  1995 libutil.so.2.0   <- non-working
-r--r--r--  1 root  bin  8742 Dec 21 20:42 libutil.so.2.0   <- working

    I guess I shouldn't be installing the compat2x.tgz chunk then,
since that (I assume) is where the libutil.so.2.0 dated Jan 25 1995
comes from.
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org)
Systems Administrator, Internex Online Inc.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"