Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:39:31 -0800 (PST) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: CAM_NEW_TRAN- kernel changes ready for review Message-ID: <20061030193803.D19253@ns1.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <7579f7fb0610300801x4650cb3fgb93f662fbf7b4213@mail.gmail.com> References: <7579f7fb0610281854l3ec600d7kf0a2cdf20fdcb838@mail.gmail.com> <7579f7fb0610282210p59de2123g379f0d4069bd1e42@mail.gmail.com> <45443C7F.5040508@samsco.org> <7579f7fb0610300801x4650cb3fgb93f662fbf7b4213@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long wrote: > 3) For atapi-cam, I think that the cts->protocol should still be > PROTO_SCSI, not PROTO_ATA. Having cpi->transport by XPORT_SPI also > seems wrong, as IDE is fairly different from SPI, and I'd like at some > point to have a real IDE/SATA transport that understands the > differences. Fixed in the patches, plus some of the style(9) nits. I intend to commit tonite. -matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061030193803.D19253>