From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 00:06:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B731838; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 00:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gpo2.cc.swin.edu.au (gpo2.cc.swin.edu.au [136.186.1.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2C5EA6; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 00:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [136.186.229.37] (garmitage.caia.swin.edu.au [136.186.229.37]) by gpo2.cc.swin.edu.au (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t09053Gk030200; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:05:28 +1100 Message-ID: <54AF1B2F.3060107@swin.edu.au> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:05:03 +1100 From: grenville armitage User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121107 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lepore Subject: Re: trimming... Re: I need some swap partion help on new 10.1 install References: <20150102210855.GE867@rancor.immure.com> <20150102144223.14a2987e@nunki.holyordnance.org> <20150102215604.GF867@rancor.immure.com> <20150102145801.6ea92658@nunki.holyordnance.org> <6b9041859ceb265eedaf6f56f9178a7b@ultimatedns.net> <20150102163539.1eaadbc7@nunki.holyordnance.org> <20150103172527.GI867@rancor.immure.com> <201501081153.t08BrQkU054569@dyslexicfish.net> <54AF045C.5080502@swin.edu.au> <1420756718.14601.126.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1420756718.14601.126.camel@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:06:04 -0000 On 01/09/2015 09:38, Ian Lepore wrote: [..] > Yeah, it's horrible. Really the only worse thing that could happen is > that someone could strip away all the context Fair enough. You think eliding context is a bad thing. I think there's a balance to be had -- every email does not need to be a self-contained archive of a thread's history. This particular thread seemed to have reached an educational conclusion, so some meta-discussion is hardly a capital offence. > and change the thread into > a metadiscussion that just deteriorates into a bunch of AOL-like "me > too" replies. That would indeed be unfortunate. cheers, gja