From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 19 16:41:15 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA02851 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 16:41:15 -0700 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA02845 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 16:41:14 -0700 Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id QAA10883 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 16:41:14 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <199504192341.QAA10883@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: Minutes of the Thursday, April 13th core team meeting in Berkeley. To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 16:41:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <199504192157.XAA10846@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Apr 19, 95 11:57:17 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 582 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > > SCSI-magtape fixes they are in already.. happenned the next day.. short reads from variable blocksize devices were broken.. e.g. dd if=/dev/rst0 bs=10k of=/tmp/xx when you had an 80 byte record at the beginning of the tape (standard IBM label) would give an error instead of returning the 80 byte record.... > > Can someone elaborate more on this? > > ... > > We should look at X.Y.Z releases every N months (3?) (2.5?) > > I think, 3 months have been the initial intent of WC for regular > releases... yes I remmeber that too. >