Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:29:39 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld broken with NO_MODULES= and MODULES_WITH_WORLD= Message-ID: <20060217122939.GE80363@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <06347782@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <27781308@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060217105540.GC80363@ip.net.ua> <06347782@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--k3qmt+ucFURmlhDS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 02:29:13PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > Unless you really need it for some reason, the MODULES_WITH_WORLD option > > is harmful -- it produces modules that aren't guaranteed to be compatib= le > > with your kernel. >=20 > Hm, do you mean to say that "modules (binaries) depend on kernel > configuration"? >=20 Sure, a lot. When built with the kernel, modules use options for that kernel, e.g. if your kernel was compiled without IPv6 support your modules will be loadable. If you build them standalone, and don't provide the NO_INET6 make option, these modules won't load. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --k3qmt+ucFURmlhDS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD9cGzqRfpzJluFF4RAj/iAJ9DXUTZO9tWeSjglcfEE3gzCyUk2gCeM2qq 0oDYbO6KY9I5LnRDsshjaj0= =XUGY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k3qmt+ucFURmlhDS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060217122939.GE80363>