From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Mar 11 17:26:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA28802
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:26:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA28785
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:26:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA14990; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:18:48 -0800 (PST)
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: jfieber@indiana.edu, mrcpu@cdsnet.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Maybe a showstopper, maybe not. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Mar 1997 11:11:29 MST."
             <199703111811.LAA25726@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:18:48 -0800
Message-ID: <14986.858129528@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > That's truly bizarre.  Do these "undeleted" files have *anything*
> > in common, so far as you can make out?
> 
> They remain after an "rm -f"?
> 
> Sorry, couldn't resist.  ;-).

I suppose I deserved that.  I meant anything *else* of course. ;)

> Gee, I wonder if this has anything to do with the cookie code and the
> multiple entry return wire protocol extension in the NFSv3 spec....
> naw!

Do you have a relatively small diff which would fix it?  If so, it
seems like John has the perfect test case, not to mention a strong
reason to have it brought in if it works.

					Jordan