From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Apr 18 8:20: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.palmerharvey.co.uk (mail.palmerharvey.co.uk [62.172.109.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7993537B60C; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:19:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk) Received: from ho-nt-01.pandhm.co.uk (unverified) by mail.palmerharvey.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.0.1) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:13:40 +0100 Received: from admin.palmerharvey.co.uk (ADMIN [10.100.1.20]) by ho-nt-01.pandhm.co.uk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 2ZS4QLQN; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:18:42 +0100 Received: from voodoo.pandhm.co.uk (voodoo.pandhm.co.uk [10.100.35.12]) by admin.palmerharvey.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF947C5; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:19:30 +0100 (BST) Received: by voodoo.pandhm.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 104) id 23182A1; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:19:30 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:19:29 +0100 To: Alexander Langer Cc: dom@palmerharvey.co.uk, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, ache@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/18075: New version of unzip - 5.41 Message-ID: <20000418161929.A976@voodoo.pandhm.co.uk> References: <20000418122953.C75561B4@voodoo.pandhm.co.uk> <20000418144906.A7147@cichlids.cichlids.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000418144906.A7147@cichlids.cichlids.com>; from alex@big.endian.de on Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 02:49:06PM +0200 X-Warning: Go away or I will replace you with a very small shell script. X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386 X-Uptime: 4:17PM up 2:29, 5 users, load averages: 0.16, 0.23, 0.19 From: Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk (Dominic Mitchell) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 02:49:06PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk (Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk): > > > This patch updates the unzip port to 5.41, the latest version (which > > includes encryption). > > shouldn't you update the unzip.with_encryption port then? I don't know. Now that encryption is part of the base port, it might be a better idea to can the unzip.with_encryption port instead. This probably needs to be fleshed out on the ports mailing list (cc'd). -- Dom Mitchell -- Palmer & Harvey McLane -- Unix Systems Administrator http://samba.org Share & Enjoy! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message