From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 01:34:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77141065670 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8108FC0A for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0V1YPV8077593 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:34:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4D46119F.5060101@sentex.net> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:34:23 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Andrews References: <20110130234533.5C86C94D3C0@drugs.dv.isc.org> In-Reply-To: <20110130234533.5C86C94D3C0@drugs.dv.isc.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELEASE_6 -> RELEASE_8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:34:27 -0000 On 1/30/2011 6:45 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > I was trying to upgrade a machine from RELEASE_6 (latest) > to RELEASE_8 (latest) via source. I was unable to get > make buildworld to complete. Strange, I have done a number of machines going from RELENG_6, RELENG_7 and then RELENG_8 without too much issue. The ports can be a bit problematic, but of the half dozen or so I have done, it hasnt been an issue. Were you using a custom kernel, or GENERIC as defined from each of the branches ? ---Mike