From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Oct 10 10:48:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F41C0743B for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:48:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A9F3218 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B132013E for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 06:48:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 06:48:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=67B HASHwzNbmuOb6Fk//9tudQ84=; b=srTlQdAby8mFFcMEYpRi/NxY6HEhxr6UXCB 21GKUve/lvNdeUp/0pJwtpcWU43wX0fhHTQN9Z0jTn2hPsHEb6H0IzhFQb+oRwI+ jA1yRmfPnCtIJurt3gOajOXiQT6P2pXrkI9cxHZkXOq2aIbOvgQWvlUu3aB66T0n htY9arL0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=67BHASHwzNbmuOb6Fk//9tudQ84=; b=X3Byf WeXdJzvj50cvXpbc7+gKsXAEUQMPxgfloEgWT6k0T0SXBCUTuYwrKai5aUnVUdiL 4ugiL3VA18KBIToKz2gYvyavpEpKhCEN8iYzCl54+412Y25yJRB1lw/Qy5jUHFA4 m7Hq3rFprTyzH52TI+z48jZn+6R5Ul/+B0zwjc= X-Sasl-enc: +eBD2kPeT8tI75xaXHZbRIQ2/3EJurkFRix292jTqZZP 1476096499 Received: from pumpkin.growveg.org (pumpkin.growveg.org [82.70.91.101]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7B9E6F29D9 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 06:48:19 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: tech-lists Subject: 11-current becoming 11-stable Message-ID: <24b1b61b-5b4d-ae98-11e0-7939c11d5a61@zyxst.net> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 11:48:12 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:48:21 -0000 Hi, I have a desktop that has run 11-current for at least the last year. I periodically rebuild kernel and world to keep on top of things. As it's a desktop, there are lots of ports installed. These are installed via the older cd /port && make install clean way, rather than poudiere. Basically I'm asking that, when 11-stable becomes available (as far as I can see, it's still at PRERELEASE), is it worthwhile/advisable to recompile all my ports after doing the make world & make delete-old dance? thanks, -- J.