From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jul 20 15:42:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4358237B401 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 15:42:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: (from eischen@localhost) by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id SAA22479; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:41:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:41:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The whole libc FILE/stdio mess and 5.0 In-Reply-To: <20010720172857.C40025@sneakerz.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Daniel Eischen [010720 17:00] wrote: > > Were we going to do anything to get rid of: > > > > #define stdin (&__sF[0]) > > #define stdout (&__sF[1]) > > #define stderr (&__sF[2]) > > > > for 5.0-release, or is the current fix the one we want to > > go with. I don't know if we ever decided how it should be > > properly fixed, or if it should be fixed at all. > > considering the recent breakage wrt to PAM i'm more than happy > to apply a diff to fix this. flamage will be repsonded to in > my usual manner and we'll have the problem fixed. please > submit patches. Well, peter attempted this in version 1.29 of stdio.h, but the impact was too great at the time. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message