From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr  5 07:17:16 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDEAB71
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Apr 2014 07:17:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dec.sakura.ne.jp (dec.sakura.ne.jp [210.188.226.8])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8032E9CE
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Apr 2014 07:17:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fortune.joker.local (180-198-238-43.nagoya1.commufa.jp
 [180.198.238.43]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by dec.sakura.ne.jp (8.14.2/8.14.2/[SAKURA-WEB]/20080708) with ESMTP id
 s356SuFx013076
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 15:28:56 +0900 (JST)
 (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp)
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 15:28:55 +0900
From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What's up with the swapping since 10/stable
Message-Id: <20140405152855.1cfcf37c87bdff3306d0cd6c@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <CA+D9Qhvr+ny80J1zSxPNC_bH1gtvJAOxkfmLXxuiFZsRVyXQ3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+D9QhvDsTwosUxUeL2U05dMt+Ke6kY5BYCNjJo8e8TsfZTsXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <A4BE503B-ADA9-4F61-893E-79A5F30728A2@bridgenet.se>
 <533DB9B1.3070500@denninger.net>
 <CA+D9Qhvr+ny80J1zSxPNC_bH1gtvJAOxkfmLXxuiFZsRVyXQ3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Junchoon corps
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 07:17:16 -0000

Yes, Karl's patch fixed my swap regression, too.
ZFS-root notebook with 8GB RAM, stable/10 amd64.

No swap usage is observed after applying his patch, feeling (but not
measured) no performance penalty.

But unfortunately, the patch haven't been merged even to head.
So, anyone chasing vanilla head or stable/10 has no fix yet.


On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:24:52 +0200
Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> wrote:

> This was an old post and after few week Karl came up with an arc patch
> which fixed this issue.


-- 
Tomoaki AOKI    junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp