From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 3 0:44:24 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2BC37B401; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 00:44:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FC4C43E4A; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 00:44:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 3 Feb 2003 08:44:21 +0000 (GMT) To: Juli Mallett Cc: Steve Kargl , Bakul Shah , Mark Murray , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rand() is broken In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Feb 2003 16:02:27 PST." <20030202160227.B62390@FreeBSD.org> X-Request-Do: Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 08:44:18 +0000 From: David Malone Message-ID: <200302030844.aa84195@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > FWIW - AIX aggrees with Solaris. > Endiannes, or an SVR4 implementation difference? OS X agrees with FreeBSD i386. In fact, FreeBSD sparc64 and FreeBSD alpha are all the same too, so it seems the code isn't too sensitive to byteorder or wordsize. Bakul's comments on who agrees with BSD 4.{2,3,4}-* probably explain the differences. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message