Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 19:21:36 -0500 (EST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> Cc: steve hovey <shovey@buffnet.net>, Craig Huckabee <huck@slartibartfast.nosc.mil>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pty limit of 64 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951229192048.7547B-100000@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <199512292317.PAA02889@corbin.Root.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 Dec 1995, David Greenman wrote: > >On Fri, 29 Dec 1995, David Greenman wrote: > > > >> As for ptys, 32 units are fully supported for each of ttyp, q, r, and s, > >>and if you're not using xterms, another 32 ptys each are supported for P, Q, R, > >> and S...for a total of 256 ptys. > >> > > Okay, simple question...is there a way of telling xterms to use > >particular ptys, namely those in the ttyP+ range? Freeing up the 128 from > >p-s? > > The problem is that xterm as written does not know about P-S. It only knows > about p-s. There's no way to work around this except by modifying the xterm > source to teach it about P-S. > Ack, sorry about that...I misread your original...I thought it said 'if you're using...', totally blinded to the 'not' part of it. Sincerest apologies...:( Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail Telnet Acct DNS Hosting System | WWW Services Database Services | Knowledge, Administrator | | Information and scrappy@ki.net | WWW: http://www.ki.net | Communications, Inc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.951229192048.7547B-100000>