From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 12 6:58:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59E537B403; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 06:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 640105361; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:58:24 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Julian Elischer Cc: Juli Mallett , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Looking for comments on a new utility... References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 12 Jun 2002 15:58:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Julian Elischer writes: > we need to extend this to handle a full thread table per process.. > anyone have any ideas on how to do this? Unfortunately, I think we're going to end up reimplementing procfs in the sysctl tree... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message