From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 22 13:09:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D60106566B; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231758FC08; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfw7 with SMTP id fw7so6273091vcb.13 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 06:09:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gYUIOSnqTPX+xsdZyXjRTsB/jme2VvOisrMrNk7uLyo=; b=u9i2rUYhhRbbOuns33cpkGQgzkaVGK8bnpkAcpuXjMUB/x+0omVLjTahJX3byn0QIQ vVVHk2M3eQCnHmoNqF2X1OMfI4tsIPq6m2jhSkc0vyxfNUmwzfVCrEISymszzrMHfK+F Y0qOcHgFG/FD8PdEYFDdJQfxd/d1RJVQ7Qh0Uf2xOH+noVfDGBLbhhrILNmA72IaF6ND GMiPHsNHn775wJ14HQM0KqpM0Up3iiZq3ty9jHozZV5BoS7NQlUI/mzzo0cgSbfBaXA9 HZ13tzZnAXfZ6U03wNTUMvYiu318k+bS0R2FaVwmm8kom2emz8Gr1muGtwm/IDs8No6k 1gkg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.221.203 with SMTP id id11mr4567671vcb.42.1348319340876; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 06:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.1.103 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 06:09:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <505D9743.1020002@netfence.it> References: <505D9743.1020002@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:09:00 +0300 Message-ID: From: "Andrew W. Nosenko" To: Andrea Venturoli Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ashish@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: emacs23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:09:02 -0000 On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > What are the plans for emacs23? > It is marked as vulnerable now, but emacs24 is almost unusable (1)... > > bye & Thanks > av. > > (1) I'm mainly referring to gdb integration: in case anyone is interested, I > can describe some of the problems. Did you asked about that in emacs development list (emacs-devel@gnu.org)? -- Andrew W. Nosenko