From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 15 17:09:51 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA01479 for current-outgoing; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:09:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (root@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA01473 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:09:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from campa.panke.de (anonymous215.ppp.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.215]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id CAA06391; Sat, 16 Nov 1996 02:06:56 +0100 Received: (from wosch@localhost) by campa.panke.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) id BAA01725; Sat, 16 Nov 1996 01:00:38 +0100 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 1996 01:00:38 +0100 From: Wolfram Schneider Message-Id: <199611160000.BAA01725@campa.panke.de> To: Mikael Karpberg Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (add|rm)(user|group) In-Reply-To: <199611140846.JAA03583@ocean.campus.luth.se> References: <199611121553.QAA00777@campa.panke.de> <199611140846.JAA03583@ocean.campus.luth.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Mikael Karpberg writes: >I haven't looked at them at all, but I thought I'd just comment on their >names as you listed them above. > >addgroup / adduser - seems logical >rmgroup / removeuser - not so logical > >Why not rmuser or removegroup ? I think it would be nice with consistant >naming, maybe? I will rename 'removeuser' to 'rmuser', to be compatible with BSD/OS Wolfram