From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 3 20:18:39 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34A75BDE5E for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 20:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (vogon.madpilot.net [159.69.1.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FCSt66Jymz4sQx for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 20:18:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCSsz0yy8z6gY1; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 22:18:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id BGweRNJ2QoYM; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 22:18:29 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: No update for a day on ports? To: LuMiWa , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: The Doctor References: <405a8bca-33e9-77ca-14d9-80761ac505cc@madpilot.net> <25d29e77-57a1-9562-6e24-0468c3a5e063@madpilot.net> <7a4f0ff4-5802-a8b2-5e97-9cd9109c900d@madpilot.net> <20210403121033.3afb765c@dismail.de> From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 22:18:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210403121033.3afb765c@dismail.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FCSt66Jymz4sQx X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.00 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[madpilot.net:s=bjowvop61wgh]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[159.69.1.99:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[159.69.1.99:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[madpilot.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[madpilot.net,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 20:18:39 -0000 On 03/04/21 18:10, LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote: > > It is not good. The last was I did red was "portsnap" stay still for > awhile. I am portsnap and portmaster user for years. Where should I > find information what will happened with /usr/ports. Will gitup just > replace, update? I am using FreeBSD 13.0-RC5. > Thank you. > I have no definitive information regarding portsnap. I only remember reading a comment in the last few days to the effect of it being discontinued and suggested a replacement, but I could be wrong about this. I've not been using it for a while and I have not followed news about it. -- Guido Falsi