Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:21:30 +0000 From: Florent Peterschmitt <fpeterscom@gmail.com> To: Olivier Duchateau <duchateau.olivier@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x11/Terminal - why not xfce4-terminal Message-ID: <50648B1A.50406@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHcdu2oMW-OYZ_K6VC0HXafa2vZbap_6_5ERpv9umSL-VF8c2Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <50630E95.1060400@gmail.com> <20120926152651.3ea916ce@laptop> <5063118C.9080404@gmail.com> <CAHcdu2oMW-OYZ_K6VC0HXafa2vZbap_6_5ERpv9umSL-VF8c2Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 26/09/2012 14:10, Olivier Duchateau a écrit : > 2012/9/26 Florent Peterschmitt<fpeterscom@gmail.com>: >> Le 26/09/2012 12:26, Sergey V. Dyatko a écrit : >> >>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:17:57 +0000 >>> Florent Peterschmitt<fpeterscom@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Why the terminal emulator from XFCE4 is called Terminal instead of >>>> xfce4-terminal ? >>> http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/terminal >>> >>> >>> >> Ok, then next question. Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory called >> xfce (or xfce4 if versionning becomes important) ? >> > What do you mean by « Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory > called xfce » ? > > > Have something like /usr/ports/xfce/<xfce apps> ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50648B1A.50406>