Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:21:30 +0000
From:      Florent Peterschmitt <fpeterscom@gmail.com>
To:        Olivier Duchateau <duchateau.olivier@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: x11/Terminal - why not xfce4-terminal
Message-ID:  <50648B1A.50406@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHcdu2oMW-OYZ_K6VC0HXafa2vZbap_6_5ERpv9umSL-VF8c2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <50630E95.1060400@gmail.com> <20120926152651.3ea916ce@laptop> <5063118C.9080404@gmail.com> <CAHcdu2oMW-OYZ_K6VC0HXafa2vZbap_6_5ERpv9umSL-VF8c2Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 26/09/2012 14:10, Olivier Duchateau a écrit :
> 2012/9/26 Florent Peterschmitt<fpeterscom@gmail.com>:
>> Le 26/09/2012 12:26, Sergey V. Dyatko a écrit :
>>
>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:17:57 +0000
>>> Florent Peterschmitt<fpeterscom@gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Why the terminal emulator from XFCE4 is called Terminal instead of
>>>> xfce4-terminal ?
>>> http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/terminal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Ok, then next question. Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory called
>> xfce (or xfce4 if versionning becomes important) ?
>>
> What do you mean by « Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory
> called xfce » ?
>
>
>
Have something like /usr/ports/xfce/<xfce apps> ?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50648B1A.50406>