From nobody Fri Nov 17 17:51:05 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SX4Fq2zgJz51Cqy for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 17:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SX4Fp3RbKz4X6s for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 17:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 193.175.24.27 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of tuexen@freebsd.org) smtp.mailfrom=tuexen@freebsd.org; dmarc=none Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:ecd2:bf6:77d5:2c9f]) (Authenticated sender: micmac) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 426BF721E280D; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 18:51:06 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.200.91.1.1\)) Subject: Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK From: tuexen@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <2bbfcf68-3249-45c7-a8e5-af7115a1ccfe@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 18:51:05 +0100 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <42C327BD-6CE4-43AA-A1AE-3BEC08D623DB@freebsd.org> <2bbfcf68-3249-45c7-a8e5-af7115a1ccfe@gmail.com> To: Johan Hendriks X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.200.91.1.1) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[193.175.24.27:from]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:193.174.0.0/15, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[tuexen]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4SX4Fp3RbKz4X6s X-Spamd-Bar: -- > On Nov 17, 2023, at 17:06, Johan Hendriks = wrote: >=20 > I am running the rack stack for quiet some time now on a baremetal = machiene and never had problems. > Also use pf. This is a test machine so not a lot happening on it. >=20 > Are there any thing we can test? Do we have some test scripts we can = run? We are actually interested in feedback about using the stack in whatever use case you use TCP for. The stack has been tested with the Netflix use case, but not so much with others. That is why we ask for broader = testing. Best regards Michael >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20