From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 20:53:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3C6106566B for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE64F8FC08 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (r2bb217.net.upc.cz [62.245.117.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5OKr2Hb018246; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:53:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: "Philip M. Gollucci" In-Reply-To: <4C23AFE6.9080604@p6m7g8.com> References: <4C235CE4.3060800@FreeBSD.org> <4C23AFE6.9080604@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-c4ZiOGUXEdTj5PrvuRBD" Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:53:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1277412781.8151.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 62.245.117.217; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: pgollucci@FreeBSD.org, apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: AP_FAST_BUILD problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:53:09 -0000 --=-c4ZiOGUXEdTj5PrvuRBD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Philip M. Gollucci p=ED=B9e v =E8t 24. 06. 2010 v 19:20 +0000: > > your recent sweep to convert mod_* ports to AP_FAST_BUILD can lead to > > hard to detect runtime problems, when the module consists from more tha= n > > one .c file. We just hit tis on mod_layout22 here at my job. > >=20 > > You might want to do a pass over all ports you changed, and revert when > > needed. > >=20 > I don't disagree, but you'll have to give me more info for why. The > whole point of apxs is that it can handle or or more .c files. The > specific error you see in layout22 would be of much use. The specific issue with layout22 was that ports framework only compiled one .c file with apxs (mod_layout.c) which then failed on apache startup due to missing symbols which would normally come from utility.c --=20 Pav Lucistnik Alignment: Neutral Greedy --=-c4ZiOGUXEdTj5PrvuRBD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkwjxakACgkQntdYP8FOsoKb6wCfeV0nuojNNb0L7xQ3zA5cDy8Z puIAn1GVSlYNtxt2X4WgRY7F/+MwcdcN =AR6x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-c4ZiOGUXEdTj5PrvuRBD--