From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 19:53:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 581A560C; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gromit.grondar.org (grandfather.grondar.org [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c20:0:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E2D5195; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2001:470:9174:1:c160:6db5:dfbd:9b92] by gromit.grondar.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XruH9-000Nda-KM; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:53:51 +0000 Subject: Re: svn commit: r274739 - head/sys/mips/conf Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Mark R V Murray In-Reply-To: <1416598889.1147.297.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:53:50 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7387FDB9-206F-418F-8B0B-D1FB9723A4D7@grondar.org> References: <201411200552.sAK5qnXP063073@svn.freebsd.org> <20141120084832.GE24601@funkthat.com> <20141121092245.GI99957@funkthat.com> <1416582989.1147.250.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <026FEB8A-CA8C-472F-A8E4-DA3D0AC44B34@grondar.org> <1416596266.1147.290.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <1416598889.1147.297.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> To: Ian Lepore X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-SA-Score: -1.0 Cc: arch@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:53:54 -0000 > On 21 Nov 2014, at 19:41, Ian Lepore wrote: > The arrogance in the way you talk down to me about my right and = ability > to decide these things is mind-boggling. It's clear you're going to = do > whatever you want, so I guess I'll just shut up. I=E2=80=99m sorry for offence; that was unintended. Was *was* intended was to attempt to engage you in dialogue. You are obviously annoyed, but after rather a lot of discussion (2 devsummits, 1 EuroBSDCon and a lot of email), some form of consensus was required. Unfortunately you are not one of those who could not be accommodated to the extent that you desired. We obviously couldn=E2=80=99t make everyone = happy. Some aspects of the compromise were things *I* really didn=E2=80=99t = like. I think there are ways round your problem, and I=E2=80=99ll be happy to = help you get there. Please don=E2=80=99t just hold out for one particular = solution; be flexible. M --=20 Mark R V Murray