From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 29 11:35:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF0737B400; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [216.187.105.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D0E43E42; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:35:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED7F3F28; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:35:15 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Langille" To: Gregory Neil Shapiro Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:33:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: why does this sendmail connection take so long? Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <3D6E30B3.17308.8EE7F989@localhost> In-reply-to: <15726.26491.969569.176848@horsey.gshapiro.net> References: <3D6E2D31.29065.8EDA44C7@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 29 Aug 2002 at 11:27, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > That explains it. You have a record pointing localhost.example.org at ::1 > but your sendmail daemon isn't listening for IPv6 connections and worse yet > your host appears to drop instead of reject connection attempts. My guess > is you have IP firewalling enabled (either IPFW or IPF) and default to drop > or have ip6fw or ipf rulesets that effectively to do the same. I am using ipf with "pass out from any to any/pass out from any to any". FWIW: in this case localhost.example.org is the DNS server for my private LAN. -- Dan Langille I'm looking for a computer job: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message