From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Sep 16 01:45:20 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id BAA06796
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 01:45:20 -0700
Received: from silver.sms.fi (silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA06789
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 01:45:16 -0700
Received: (from pete@localhost) by silver.sms.fi (8.6.12/8.6.9) id LAA24544; Sat, 16 Sep 1995 11:45:02 +0300
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 11:45:02 +0300
Message-Id: <199509160845.LAA24544@silver.sms.fi>
From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi>
To: davidg@Root.COM
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Which SUP files are available and where ? 
In-Reply-To: <199509152322.QAA00165@corbin.Root.COM>
References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950915160524.21497B-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
	<199509152322.QAA00165@corbin.Root.COM>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

David Greenman writes:
 > >
 > >  Ok, if this is the general consensus, when will 2.1 be available?
 > 
 >    "Soon". It's looking very good indeed.
 > 
 > -DG

Will there be 2.2-STABLE and 2.3-CURRENT after the 2.1-RELEASE happens?
I'm for this because I see it very valuable to have two branches of code
in addition to releases. -STABLE has proven it's right to exist, IMO.

Pete