Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 20:11:09 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239939] graphics/mesa-dri: switch to default python version for build Message-ID: <bug-239939-7141-yrF739NMdx@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-239939-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-239939-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239939 --- Comment #17 from John Hein <jcfyecrayz@liamekaens.com> --- (In reply to Niclas Zeising from comment #11) I am trying to understand the concern with the patch that disables things t= hat are already built by mesa-libs (upon which this port depends). If this port (mesa-dri) somehow built egl, gles2, glx differently than the mesa-libs por= t, then wouldn't it be worse to build against one version and than have a run-= time link against the other? I am inclined to think that it would be safer to n= ot build them and force the mesa-dri build to referennce headers and link to l= ibs that are part of the mesa-libs package. The build time improvement is less important of course. The QA admonishmen= t is a little more important. But I think it's probably best to build against a consistent set of mesa libs & headers. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239939-7141-yrF739NMdx>