From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 10:17:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AEE37B401 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.ncipher.com (mail.ncipher.com [62.190.84.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5DB43FD7 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:17:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from markk@knigma.org) Received: from cromer.ncipher.com ([172.23.135.200]) by mail.ncipher.com with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.34 #1) id 193fgL-0007A7-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:17:49 +0100 Received: from lap.knigma.org (mourn.ncipher.com [172.19.133.171]) by cromer.ncipher.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3AHHgml016927 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:17:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from markk@knigma.org) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:17:34 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Mark Knight MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Turnpike/6.02-U () Subject: Odd sendmail error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:17:52 -0000 One my 4.8 box I recently made a silly mistake sending a mail from the command line, along the lines of: mkn@shrewd$ mail test@knigma.org -c test@knigma.org Subject: test test EOT mkn@shrewd$ WARNING: RunAsGid for MSP ignored, check group ids (egid=1001, want=25) can not chdir(/var/spool/clientmqueue/): Permission denied Program mode requires special privileges, e.g., root or TrustedUser. Obviously I meant: mkn@shrewd$ mail -c test@knigma.org test@knigma.org which works absolutely fine, so it's not a major problem. I'd just be interested in knowing why my mistake lead to such an odd message! I believe my sendmail / clientmqueue permissions are the installed default and sane. Cheers, -- Mark A. R. Knight