Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:09:45 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Macros in <stdio.h> Message-ID: <20021014020945.GI95327@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20021014094459.A25812@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <20021014094459.A25812@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org> [021013 16:49] wrote: > Since revision 1.25 of src/include/stdio.h removed the macro versions of > putc() and getc(), is there any reason why we shouldn't go the whole way > and remove the rest of the macros (*_unlocked()) ? > > This would let us make FILE opaque and move the definition of > struct __sFILE into src/lib/libc/stdio/local.h. This would also let us > remove the __sFILEX hack. But don't we want some level of speed for stdio operations even at the expense of some transparency? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021014020945.GI95327>