From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Nov 1 19:04:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA20511 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 1 Nov 1998 19:04:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat0045.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.188.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA20504 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 1998 19:04:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA16699; Sun, 1 Nov 1998 23:04:27 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 23:04:21 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG cc: John Polstra Subject: ECGS ... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm generally the last person to complain about a particular port, but why is there a development version of EGCS 2.x in the ports, but not stable version? :( I'm trying to get KOffice working, which requires mico 2.2.1 to compile with --disable-mini-stl, but it fails, where it works find under EGCS 1.1 ... I've sent email to the egcs developers asking them about it, but, assuming that at one time there was a 1.1 stable port of EGCS, any way of getting that un-earthed and put into ports beside the development/snapshot version? Thanks... Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message