From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 22 11:57:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA16710 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 11:57:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (winter@sasami.jurai.net [207.153.65.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA16699 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 18:57:53 GMT (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA12700; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:55:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:55:13 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: Garrett Wollman , Harlan Stenn , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/6353 In-Reply-To: <4382.893270904@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > The question is, should it be a port or should it be contrib ? > > I guess we should leave this to whoever submits either of these first :-) Heh. I really don't care which. Having it in contrib means we can frob it if we need to but we can do that with ports patch files too. Either way I've got to reintegrate my ftp-user maps whenver I upgrade or whatever. (You know, I really should get around to doing that...) /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message