From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 23:22:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id E831016A4D0; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:49 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A568D16A4CE; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1249843D45; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.250]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5SNMmJ0020745; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:22:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5SNMmxm051939; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:22:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5SNMm8q051938; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:22:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:22:48 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: David Xu Message-ID: <20040628232248.GB51785@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <200406280413.i5S4DS0D033867@repoman.freebsd.org> <40DFBA3C.7040806@freebsd.org> <20040628174213.GA51072@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <40E0A3FD.1000804@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E0A3FD.1000804@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Daniel Eischen cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 55970 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:50 -0000 On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:04:29AM +0800, David Xu wrote: > > > OK, ttrace was existing before lwpid_t was introduced, I will > check if I can reuse ptrace interface. Thanks! I haven't worried about the ability to resume single threads and also wait for single threads. I think we can safely ignore that for now. So, if ptrace(2) only gives us limited support, but it's enough for now than I think modifying ptrace(2) is a good option. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net