From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 7 20:30:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8F61065672; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 20:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lytboris@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f209.google.com (mail-fx0-f209.google.com [209.85.220.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFB88FC20; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 20:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so2406751fxm.13 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:30:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jlu1s65EUPHenQtN3u+2106//iQMLkxNi/EwmUuV8HM=; b=EpmHixb5OoSnyP5ZvMZSqUIu6lQ3aMEGhPO95YY00NtI34hfPP3auF4PK+YFfDyk+X O3cLiGVCI/pdiddX+zt4G93RFtDEeHCNOYWiu3T1sgtkL+N6+aljLYD1STqJFXptb1o8 646EmzvAgzNyqD1HzirD/hbQFWImmuTvLb5os= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=s6EkP2ZCqU9Aq85J66fPS7MOi77QmdupK3iSCMBLcf+KdHHiw+1wQxaPuQuT3aSpsz I35f2hgOcnnLzpputcMGjkjj29oIJAw45JaZ5ardJNURkOgYpYG470fFdc+sU2jo15uC +ZmY6opuJqsr3GorKvVnbnCYP6jj4w9+wzGnk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.139.6 with SMTP id r6mr627387hbr.205.1260217807132; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:30:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9a542da30912071221t289a57a8gdfbb12c8a0b84753@mail.gmail.com> References: <200912061804.nB6I4R38027652@svn.freebsd.org> <4B1D437F.4050601@elischer.org> <4B1D4723.5090908@elischer.org> <200912072029.05907.max@love2party.net> <933fa9790912071145k4d97c177qc6f963ba0ffbb13@mail.gmail.com> <9a542da30912071221t289a57a8gdfbb12c8a0b84753@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:30:07 +0300 Message-ID: <933fa9790912071230n56f27f5bhcdec44d22a1c5126@mail.gmail.com> From: Lytochkin Boris To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Luigi Rizzo , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer , sem@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Max Laier Subject: Re: svn commit: r200183 - head/sbin/ipfw X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:30:10 -0000 there are multiple addresses on em0 (for example): 95.108.197.225/27 10.60.128.225/24 10.61.128.225/24 ... 10.70.128.225/24 default router is in 95.108.197.225/27 network. 10.X addresses are used for SLB - SLB router does DNAT and forward client's connection to this node, so node should forward all packets from 10.X addresses to .254 - SLB router IPs. ipfw config would be something like =3D=3D=3D=3D ipfw add 60 fwd 10.60.128.254 ip from 10.60.128.0/24 to any out ipfw add 61 fwd 10.61.128.254 ip from 10.61.128.0/24 to any out ... ipfw add 70 fwd 10.70.128.254 ip from 10.70.128.0/24 to any out allow 65534 ip from any to any =3D=3D=3D=3D pf variant will be accordingly =3D=3D=3D=3D scrub in all fragment reassemble pass in all flags S/SA keep state pass out quick route-to (em0 10.60.128.254) inet from 10.60.128.0/24 to any flags S/SA keep state ... pass out quick route-to (em0 10.60.128.254) inet from 10.70.128.0/24 to any flags S/SA keep state =3D=3D=3D=3D My box is a cluster node, not router, just simple policy-based routing requ= ired On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Ermal Lu=E7i wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Lytochkin Boris wrot= e: >> >> Hi! >> >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Max Laier wrote: >> [cut] >> > I just tested an install of r197983 (9.0-CURRENT) that I had on a >> > test-box and >> > route-to works as it is supposed to - AFAICT. =A0FWIW, pf sets sin_len= for >> > every >> > use. >> > >> > Might be a problem/mis-understanding in the OPs configuration that is >> > the >> > issue here? >> > >> > I'll follow up to the thread on -net@ is a second. >> >> I posted my pf config in original message to -net@: >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> scrub in all fragment reassemble >> pass in all flags S/SA keep state >> pass out quick route-to (em0 10.60.128.254) inet from 10.60.128.0/24 >> to any flags S/SA keep state >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> Pretty simple. Even when forward is disabled packets that are matched >> by route-to rule are forwarded to default gateway instead of specified >> in route-to. And I checked rtalloc_ign_fib() arguments when using pf - >> seems that pf does not use this function to lookup route-to route. >> >> +sem@ >> > > My crystal ball is broken. > Explain your freebsd config, your network topology, some debug output and > then it can be considered useful. > > There are many people using route-to on FreeBSD 8 so it would have come u= p > before. > >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Boris Lytochkin > > > > -- > Ermal >