From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 17 06:34:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D387CCA for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeus@ibs.dn.ua) Received: from relay.ibs.dn.ua (relay.ibs.dn.ua [91.216.196.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE672E14 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ibs.dn.ua (relay.ibs.dn.ua [91.216.196.25]) by relay.ibs.dn.ua with ESMTP id r8H6Yon8020672; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:34:50 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <20130917093450.20670@relay.ibs.dn.ua> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:34:50 +0300 From: "Zeus Panchenko" To: "Matthew Seaman" Subject: how are rc "collisions" solved? Organization: I.B.S. LLC X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3.1; GNU Mailutils 2.99.98; GNU Emacs 24.0.93 X-Face: &sReWXo3Iwtqql1[My(t1Gkx; y?KF@KF`4X+'9Cs@PtK^y%}^.>Mtbpyz6U=,Op:KPOT.uG )Nvx`=er!l?WASh7KeaGhga"1[&yz$_7ir'cVp7o%CGbJ/V)j/=]vzvvcqcZkf; JDurQG6wTg+?/xA go`}1.Ze//K; Fk&/&OoHd'[b7iGt2UO>o(YskCT[_D)kh4!yY'<&:yt+zM=A`@`~9U+P[qS:f; #9z~ Or/Bo#N-'S'!'[3Wog'ADkyMqmGDvga?WW)qd=?)`Y&k=o}>!ST\ Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Zeus Panchenko List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 06:34:54 -0000 hi, what will happen in case I have two contradictory scripts? lets say, script A defines daemon xxx start before daemon yyy and B defines it around way how system will perform in this case? -- Zeus V. Panchenko jid:zeus@im.ibs.dn.ua IT Dpt., I.B.S. LLC GMT+2 (EET)