Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:32:45 +0200
From:      John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>,  John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r363524 - in head/emulators/pearpc: . files
Message-ID:  <53D9E30D.3030902@marino.st>
In-Reply-To: <20140731060809.GA20983@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201407302302.s6UN2GCn094189@svn.freebsd.org> <20140731060809.GA20983@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/31/2014 08:08, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:02:16PM +0000, John Marino wrote:
>> New Revision: 363524
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/363524
>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r363524/
>>
>> Log:
>>   emulators/pearpc: Upgrade version 0.4 => 0.5 and stage
> 
> I didn't test this commit, but last time I was looking at updating pearpc
> port, 0.5 could not boot Darwin images from apple.com, while 0.4 could.
> 
> Did you perform any run-time testing?

No, I did not.  With our PR backlog, the most I can afford is individual
poudriere build testing.

>(even better, ask submiter about it)

It was novel's port (added to CC), maybe he wants to check it out.
If not and it's runtime broken and it can't be fixed easily and nobody
wants to take maintainership, let's consider deprecating it (0.4 came
out in 2005).  Certain ports should not maintainerless, this is probably
one of them.

btw, I'm pretty sure the submitter checked the build like I did.

John



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53D9E30D.3030902>