Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:24:27 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: "\[LoN\]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> Cc: Q <qdolan@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Appropriate way of submitting multiple related ports at once? Message-ID: <44692164@ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <471A32F2.3060402@gmx.de> (Kamikaze's message of "Sat\, 20 Oct 2007 18\:55\:14 %2B0200") References: <2365F582-9CA6-4E21-AF82-42791A2F8E10@gmail.com> <471A0C34.6060505@gmx.de> <32214370@ipt.ru> <471A32F2.3060402@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:55:14 +0200 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:09:56 +0200 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> Q wrote: > > > >>> I have written a collection of ports (16 in total) for building a > >>> typical Apple WebObjects deployment environment. As most of these ports > >>> depend on one another in some way could someone advise what the most > >>> appropriate way to submit these ports as a bundle would be? > > > >> Why don't you just pack them all into a single shar archive and submit them as > >> one PR? That's what I'd do. > > > > I'd say that this depends upon the sibmitters' experience with ports > > PRs. If there is none committers' questions, etc at the PR - it's > > fine. Otherwise I'd prefer to deal with ports per PR. > Well, you can submit several shar files in one PR and they can be tested, > patched and commited one by one. The PR simply would be closed after all ports > have successfully been committed. Seems I was not clear, sorry. It so happens that I usually send two-four followups per ports PR for a submitter to polish the patches (BTW, nobody complained so far). In that case if all ports are at one PR that may become a nightmare. ;-) WBR -- bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44692164>