Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:23:01 -0800 (PST)
From:      Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com>
To:        Matt Smith <fbsd@xtaz.co.uk>
Cc:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option
In-Reply-To: <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk>
References:  <D029D964D3A96A570922090C@ogg.in.absolight.net> <ee422bd630292fe6f7bc5439799667de@lhaven.homeip.net> <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163325.3A8FCBDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <67897B782F897C2A66FCD458@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150113233952.BF862BDC24@prod2.absolight.net> <B5BC1F9B1E9B32C89F11B397@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150114031156.400F2BDC3E@prod2.absolight.net> <507F8738895177F5640A4090@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150114120852.GA17865@xtaz.uk>

| previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you Matt.  It is refreshing to hear an actual business case for the
reasons REPLACE_BASE was created.  Thank you also for the pointers to a
way of avoid dulpicate binaries.  Do you know of more detailed
documentation on how to prevent installworld and freebsd-update from
installing these binaries in the first place?

That leaves the issue of cross-platform compatibility, which is still
broken without REPLACE_BASE.  What about those of us who support
environments that aren't BSD monocultures?

Roger Marquis



>> Well, like I said, REPLACE_BASE was an abomination that should never have
>> existed, now that it's gone, it'll never get back, and you'll never see it
>> again.
>
> Doug Barton who used to maintain BIND in both the base system and the port 
> used to always say that the version in the base system was only designed to 
> be used as a local resolver on a laptop/desktop. If it was used as a proper 
> DNS server the port version was meant to be used instead. Based on this it 
> makes perfect sense why BIND was replaced with local Unbound in the base, and 
> the ports system still has BIND for people that were using it.
>
> It should have been a very small minor change. If people didn't want to have 
> two versions installed then the solution would have been to use WITHOUT_NAMED 
> or WITHOUT_BIND whatever the knob was in src.conf so that those files were 
> deleted or not installed in the first place. I do exactly this for NTPd, 
> OpenSSH, and Unbound all of which I use the port versions for so don't need 
> them in the base system.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?>