From nobody Fri Apr 1 21:46:14 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6351A418F9 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 21:46:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from mail.sermon-archive.info (sermon-archive.info [47.181.130.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KVYdj1JS4z4T6B for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 21:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from smtpclient.apple (mini [10.0.1.251]) by mail.sermon-archive.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KVYdg0JYGz2fjWX; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: Used Disk Space From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:46:14 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1B270CB3-9E95-460D-97BC-94E21E50F7D8@sermon-archive.info> References: <9D4BE892-FA1A-4B5D-B144-2D51F7D822B7@sermon-archive.info> To: Michael Schuster X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.104.2 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4KVYdj1JS4z4T6B X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bc979@lafn.org designates 47.181.130.121 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bc979@lafn.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.67 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.981]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lafn.org: no valid DMARC record]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5650, ipnet:47.181.128.0/18, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N > On 1 April 2022, at 05:01, Michael Schuster = wrote: >=20 > On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 12:09 PM Doug Hardie wrote: >>=20 >> I have two systems: one is amd64 and the other arm64. The amd64 is = 13.0, the arm64 is 13.1 RC1. The disk utilization between the machines = is quite different. For example, /usr/lib only has 2 extra files in the = arm64. They add up to less than 100 M. du -sh on amd64 shows 502M for = /usr/lib, and du -sh on arm64 shows 2.1G. Walking through the entries = on both systems, most are identical. When there are differences, they = are around 2M at most. Often they are around 10K. The arm64 is using = almost twice the space of the amd64 if you believe du. However, the sum = of the individual allocations on each system are less than 100M = different. What is going on? >=20 > I haven't done much active FS work for a while, so I'll just hazard a > guess: ZFS vs UFS? > perhaps FS allocation units are different between the two systems? >=20 > HTH > Michael Both systems are UFS. I had considered the allocation units but haven't = figured out where to check that. -- Doug=